Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Limited Things to Say

One of Jason Koo's banners. (www.smh.com.au)

Every week there are an increasing number of conspiracy theory articles claiming that News Limited is now in the business of censorship. It is unfortunate though that these articles seem to be of the crazed fan type - where journalists go out to games in search of the craziest, most devoted fan they can in an attempt to find a story.

This is what seems to have been undertaken by Brad Walter of the Sydney Morning Herald who has written a story about a fan's anger at AAMI Stadium staff who allegedly asked him to take down his supporter signs because they provided anti-News Ltd sentiments.

You can read this thrilling piece of news here.

This particular article provides the reader with what seems to be only one (very opinionated) side of a dispute.

The article begins by making reference to the election, claiming that the free speech our democracy strives for is being taken away from football fans by media conglomerates. However, the article goes on to only offer the view of the crazed fan who believes he is being censored due to his wayward opinion

Only in the final paragraph are we offered any sentiments from the opposing side – a legitimate excuse is made being that the man’s signs were blocking advertising - which we can even see in the provided picture.

To sum it all up, the sensationalist nature of the man's remarks perhaps blinds the reader to the fact that this article has very little factual basis and is merely an over the top, one sided opinion piece.

4 comments:

  1. hahaha! Oh dear.....why let diplomacy get in the way of a crazy rant right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The blog looks good. The content is substantial.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that this article is very biased. It's sad that the journalist looked more for entertaining value than the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, it is rather trite isn't it? Where is the news value in such a story. It's not like a crazy fan has any kind of prominence. The story does have curiosity value. Nevertheless it seems like the journalist was on a deadline and grasping for straws!!

    ReplyDelete